Mathematics and Democracy – Student Reflections on the Case for Quantitative Literacy
Minerva Catral, Ph.D
Mentor: Thomas Wagner, Ph.D. (Communications)

Acknowledgement. I am grateful to David Burns for his encouragement and guidance, and much thanks and appreciation are due to my mentor, Thomas Wagner, from whom I have learned so much this past year.

1. Hopes and Goals
One of the wonderful pluses in being at Xavier is that there is no lack of opportunity for growth – expansion outside one’s discipline and comfort zone is a process that continues on. I came into the Ignatian Mentoring Program (IMP) bringing with me my own (limited) expertise in my chosen field of study, with the goal of getting a broader general view from interactions and discussions with colleagues who bring with them their own expertise in their respective disciplines. The hope then is that this widened perspective might translate to a more informed instructorship and a more effective teaching and learning environment in the classroom.

I had always been curious about what output I might have at the end of participation in one of the mission-centered programs of the university. My goal in this IMP participation was to achieve greater awareness of the Jesuit mission of the university, and indeed to find out how I might contribute to this mission as I run my mathematics classes. I have learned a lot from the readings and other resources on Jesuit education and Ignatian pedagogy, but the most learning came from the sharing and discussion with others of their own experiences in incorporating the mission in their classes.

My meetings and discussions with my mentor Thomas Wagner have been invaluable. As a mathematician my classroom goals have mostly focused on “The Math”. However Thomas has given me a lot of good insight on how I might be able to reach students who may not be as excited as I am about the exquisiteness(!) of mathematics. For example, during his visit in one of my MATH 150 classes he noted how my illustration of a quadratic function as a model of the number of vehicles parked in a parking lot as a function of the time of day might be improved to something more tangible (or maybe more realistic?).

Although this article focuses on describing the outcomes of a paper requirement for my MATH 150
Honors class in Fall 2012, the broader outcome of my own IMP mentoring this past year goes far and beyond this particular class project.

2. Paper Requirement for MATH 150
“Jesuit Education and Ignatian Pedagogy values the five educational principles comprising the Ignatian pedagogical paradigm: context [understanding student life and culture], experience [providing intellectual and affective learning opportunities], reflection of meaning for self and others, action [the external expression of learned content] and evaluation of student growth.”

The goal is to embody these principles in every course that I teach. In particular, I put focus on my MATH 150 course, and as a class project I had my students perform a close look and reflection on a topic that is intimately connected to mathematics – the problem of quantitative illiteracy in today’s society.

MATH 150 is an informal introduction to Calculus, the mathematics used to describe the process of change. This course is designed for a general audience and fulfills a core mathematics requirement. In this course, a three-fold development of calculus (numerical, graphical and algebraic) replaces the traditional (purely algebraic) approach. Strong emphasis is placed on clearly communicating questions and interpretations of the results obtained, and to provide logical and convincing arguments for the results.

The students in my MATH 150 Honors class in Fall 2012 were given required readings on a collection of essays from Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy. This volume, which came out more than a decade ago, consisted of writings and reflections by a variety of professionals both inside and outside of mathematics. These essays address the issue of the disconnect between the mathematics taught in schools and the mathematics that is needed for a citizen to be a functioning member of society. The students were asked to write a paper in response to a list of questions about quantitative literacy. The result was some very thoughtful and enlightening student essays on the subject. Excerpts from these essays are given in Section 3.

2.1 Paper Guidelines
Math 150-07H Fall 2012
Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for Quantitative Literacy

Source: Steen, Lynn Arthur, executive editor, 2001. Mathematics and Democracy: The Case for
Quantitative Literacy, Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines. Available at

Read at least the first five essays in this collection, then formulate your paper as a response to the following questions.

1. What does it mean to be quantitatively literate?

2. Why is it important for society to strive towards a quantitatively literate population?

3. According to the authors, mastery of school mathematics concepts does not necessarily imply
quantitative literacy. Give some of the evidences that were cited to support this claim.

4. To conclude your paper, give some of your own reflections on quantitative literacy and give your own opinions about the arguments presented in these writings.

3 Student Reflections
The following are excerpts from the papers that the students have written.

3.1 On the meaning of quantitative literacy
“It is clear that “quantitative literacy” means different things to different people. However, a working definition of any type of literacy must evolve with the times. For example, literacy as it was defined in the 1800s would be very different from literacy as it is defined today because of new developments in almost every area of life. If changes in society are not accounted for, a standard for literacy would soon be out of date and inapplicable.

A better term for quantitative literacy may be “numeracy,” which implies a comfort and confidence with communicating using numbers. Numeracy is described as a “habit of mind,” or a way of looking at situations that come up in everyday life. Numeracy is different from mathematics in that it cannot be separated from context nor taught apart from its real-world applications. In fact, the word numeracy itself refers to an understanding of the most commonly encountered real-world applications of quantitative reasoning. Quantitative literacy, or numeracy, is “rooted in the connection between mathematics and reason.” ”

3.2 On the importance of a quantitatively literate population
“In a democracy that stresses independence and free thought, a quantitatively literate population is essential. Today, data is easier to gather and more accessible than ever, and our society is flooded with quantitative information. From advertisements to politics to news stories, we are constantly bombarded with figures. In this type of environment, a quantitatively illiterate person is at a decided disadvantage.
For example, an American citizen could not make informed decisions on how to vote on tax policies, entitlement programs, or health care if he or she cannot interpret the graphs and statistics provided in support of and in opposition to these measures. Also, jobs are becoming increasingly competitive and employers are looking to hire candidates with a solid background in data analysis and interpretation. In this type of job market, the odds are clearly against the quantitatively illiterate person. Furthermore, quantitatively illiterate persons in America experience a profound lack of social power because they lack the skills to “think for themselves,” “ask intelligent questions,” and “confront authority confidently.” In a democracy such as our own, it is important that no one group becomes marginalized, and any group that lacks the aforementioned quantitative skills would face a much greater risk of marginalization.”

“Leaders – government officials, scientific experts, health agencies, and media organizations – all use statistics to educate, persuade, and control the public. Without quantitative literacy and an understanding of how to analyze numbers and their context, people are left without the confidence or the ability to question or confront these authority figures... If we cannot understand numbers, we are relinquishing our control to those who can and allowing them to exercise that control over us.”

3.3 On school mathematics versus quantitative literacy
“Quantitative literacy is much different than statistics and mathematics. It is an empowering tool that moves away from the uncertainty and abstract nature of mathematics into a certainty rooted in real data and real situations. While mathematics teaches skills that are typically associated with success in the educational world, quantitative literacy involves tools that allow success in life.”

“Mastery of school mathematics does not necessarily mean quantitative literacy. Quantitative literacy is an extension of subjects in understanding. Numerate students are created by using mathematics in everything they do. Quantitative students are created by learning that “content is inseparable from pedagogy and context is inseparable from content,” and applying it to their everyday life and professions... Quantitative literacy is not isolated to one subject; instead, it is about applying all the information learned from different subjects and applying them to one’s life. Quantitative literacy expands from numeracy and reason.”

3.4 Further reflections
“Reading these chapters really opened my eyes to the issues that the United States faces. I agree with the authors of the chapters that quantitative literacy is important and needs to be taught in schools. It was not until this class that I actually began to catch a glimpse of how math is actually important to everyday life and how it can be applied to certain situations... I have never been interested in numbers and have never understood how the math I was doing in high school would ever be used when I was older... Throughout high school and middle school I always excelled in math. I memorized the formulas and did well on the test. After the test the information left my head as quickly as I had learned it.”

“Although I still do not see any clear-cut solution to the problem of quantitative illiteracy, I certainly can identify with feeling quantitatively illiterate. Even before reading “Math and Democracy,” I knew that I am probably innumerate in quite a few ways. I can watch a math problem be solved in front of me and then spit it out back on a test, but when it comes to looking at a situation and figuring out how to use math to solve the problem, I end up confused and frustrated every time.”

“I was never shown the importance of quantitative literacy, and thus should not be expected to recognize that importance on my own. I assume that many other students, like myself, also lacked education that stressed this literacy, which explains why there is a lack of public concern for innumeracy, unlike the large concern for illiteracy; we are taught the importance of reading and writing at an early age.”

“I do not believe that quantitative literacy should be improved in the classroom despite the fact that countless acts of legislation has put priority on science and mathematics. It is unfair to subject the majority of the populace to advanced courses for the needs of a few. Furthermore, as technology continues to advance and quantitative literacy is needed, technology can act as a simplifying aspect, instead of becoming quantitatively literate, technology can act as a translator in order to understand the world around us, instead of individuals being forced to become quantitatively literate.”

“As a student who was taught the same “school mathematics” that Schoenfeld experienced during high school, I am new to the concept of quantitative literacy. I have always seen mathematics as a discipline that did not apply to me... required mathematics were frustrating and seemed unnecessary. However, after reading these articles I am actually embarrassed by my lack of interest or concern with skills that affect my everyday life.”

“While arguments could arise exponentially for the various sides of quantitative literacy, and I do see benefits of advocating for greater stress of it study, I think there is a broader idea to approach society’s intellect from. As far as I have observed in my life thus far, as a student and American citizen, I believe our society is becoming lazy. One characteristic of laziness is exhibited by people’s lack of analytic skills and hands-on problem solving with data, as discussed with this case study. But another aspect is people’s seemingly lack of interest in anything that has to do with their minds instead of having a computer do it for them... For these reasons, I believe a greater emphasis needs to be put on “thinking” in general. Yes, much of that thought is numeracy, but I see its growth in conjunction with philosophical and scientific thinking growth.”

4 Conclusion
Overall I am happy with the papers that the students have produced. It is encouraging to see from the writings (and subsequent class discussions) how the students’ viewpoints about their own mathematics education (and education in general) have been affected by the readings from Mathematics and Democracy. It is interesting how the subject of grades has come up in these papers, and that good grades, even excellent grades, do not ultimately translate to true learning. I found the student essays to be very enlightening and these will certainly guide me in the years to come in my capacity as mathematics educator. My hope is that these too have contributed to the students’ growth and that these have truly reflected the five principles of Jesuit education and Ignatian pedagogy mentioned at the beginning of section 2: context, experience, reflection of meaning for self and others, action, and evaluation of student growth.

Back to top


Ignatian Pedagogy in Collegiate Mathematics Education

Joy Moore
, Ph.D.
Mentor: Leslie Prosak-Beres

During my participation in a Manresa Experience in the Fall of 2007, I was introduced to the concept of Ignatian Pedagogy. Considering myself to be a practitioner of culturally relevant pedagogy, I was struck by the similarities between the two pedagogical approaches. I became interested in viewing my classroom practice through the lens of an Ignatian pedagogical framework. I have always maintained a reflective journal of my classroom practice and so I decided to use that as a place to begin accounting my observations. I made journal entries during the Fall and Spring semester of the 2008-2009 academic year, presented here in summarized form. The courses discussed include MATH 120 (Elementary Functions), MATH 150 (Elements of Calculus I), MATH 201 (Foundations of Arithmetic for Early Childhood Education) and MATH 211 (Foundations of Arithmetic for Middle Childhood Education).

Ignatian Pedagogy embodies five key teaching elements--Context, Experience, Reflection, Action, and Evaluation. Under each element, I provide a brief overview of the tenets of that element (referenced from Jesuit Education and Ignatian Pedagogy September 2005, Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities, Rev. Peter-Hans Kolvenbach, S.J., Superior General of the Society of Jesus). I then provide my observations (italicized) regarding that particular element in my own pedagogical practice.


What needs to be known about learners (their environment, background, community, and potential) to teach them well?

Cura personalis - personal care and concern for the individual--is a hallmark of Jesuit education, and requires that teachers become as conversant as possible with the context or life experience of the learner. Since human experience, always the starting point in a Jesuit education, never occurs in a vacuum, educators must know as much as possible about the actual context within which teaching and learning take place.

This is something I really try to instill in my pre-service teachers. The tenet itself is supported by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. In its description of a worthwhile mathematical task, two of the 11 points delineated are as follows:

The teacher of mathematics should pose tasks that are based on-

2. knowledge of students' understandings, interests, and experiences;
10. display sensitivity to, and draw on, students' diverse background experiences and dispositions;

At the beginning of the semester we explicitly discussed these points. Preservice teachers are asked to consider every assignment within this framework of context and to explicitly state how their homework addresses these tenets.

This tenet of Ignatian Pedagogy is very much in line with culturally relevant pedagogy, in that the culture of the learner is recognized, appreciated, and incorporated in the learning experience. Culture here is defined as the political, socio-economical, religious, racial, and moral background of the learner.


What is the best way to engage learners as whole persons in the teaching and learning process?
Teachers must create the conditions whereby learners gather and recollect the material of their own experience in order to distil what they understand already in terms of facts, feelings, values, insights and intuitions they bring to the subject matter at hand. Teachers later guide the learners in assimilating new information and further experience so that their knowledge will grow in completeness and truth.

I find I do this more (or better) in my calculus and precalculus classes. Using prior knowledge as a springboard for acquisition of new knowledge is the foundation of my pedagogical approach. In particular, I want my students to realize that they do know SOMETHING about mathematics. Overcoming issues of math anxiety is the greatest challenge in MATH 120 and MATH 150. The first thing students say on entering the classroom or my office hours is “ I am not good at math”,” I have never been good at math”, “Math is not my best subject”, “Math has always been my worst subject”. Helping them realize they have a valid starting place in what they do know, empowers them, motivates, them, encourages them to try to learn more. So considerable time is spent gathering and recollecting “the material of their own experience in order to distil what they already understand” as a spring board for what knowledge I want them to acquire.

My approach is different with my preservice teachers. Particularly in MATH 201 and 211, students enter the classroom believing that they already know the content and are more than willing to “gather and recollect the material of their own experience”. In fact, most preservice teachers enter the classroom with the intention of teaching the way they have experienced their own learning. So my intent here is to show many of them a different way of understanding what they know, so that they can create different learning opportunities for their future students. I want them to experience and consequently learn to facilitate learning opportunities that expand beyond rote memorization of facts, rules, and formulas and that delve into conceptual understanding of the mathematics at hand.


How may learners become more reflective so they more deeply understand what they have learned?
Teachers lay the foundations for learning how to learn by engaging students in skills and techniques of reflection. Here memory, understanding, imagination, and feelings are used to grasp the essential meaning and value of what is being studied, to discover its relationship to other facets of human knowledge and activity, and to appreciate its implications in the continuing search for truth.

Pre-service teachers in my courses are required to keep reflective journals. This practice may be considered unusual in a mathematics content course. But I want my students to reflect on their own learning experiences as a way to inform their future teaching practices. Thinking about how they felt about (affective domain) or how they understood (cognitive) a particular mathematical concept should inform their future practice. Student comments like, “I wish I had been taught this way. It makes more sense” or “I am frustrated by this method and my students will probably be too” are important aspects of the learning process for which I want my preservice teachers to make note. However, when I review their reflective journals, the content is not as reflective as I would like. Perhaps I need to rethink my direction for this requirement. Maybe check the journals more than twice a semester. Future goal: to be more specific about content of the reflective journal. Future requirement: it must be separate from class notes.


How do we compel learners to move beyond knowledge to action?
Teachers provide opportunities that will challenge the imagination and exercise the will of the learners to choose the best possible course of action from what they have learned. What they do as a result under the teacher's direction, while it may not immediately transform the world into a global community of justice, peace and love, should at least be an educational step towards that goal even if it merely leads to new experiences, further reflections and consequent actions within the subject area under consideration.

I try to create opportunities for my preservice teachers that allow them to actually practice what they are experiencing. I require them to design lessons and make class presentations. Class discussions and peer feedback from these presentations add to their opportunity for reflection on actual practice. We have had very explicit conversations about issues of diversity in background, socioeconomic status, and types of learners. We have discussed issues of bias in standardized testing. Hopefully these types of conversations contribute to the development of this particular tenet. Though mathematics is often viewed as rote memorization of facts and figures, I want my students to experience it within various contexts so that they will teach it in like manner. Despite the fact that my courses are content courses and not method courses, I think it is important to give students an opportunity to do, practice, and teach mathematics, not just study it. Student feedback on my course evaluations indicates that this is a valuable part of the course for the majority of them.
Future goal: incorporate mathematics as social justice into my MATH 120 and Math 150 courses.


How do we assess learners’ growth in mind, heart, and spirit?
Daily quizzes, weekly or monthly tests and semester examinations are familiar instruments to assess the degree of mastery of knowledge and skills achieved. Ignatian pedagogy, however, aims at evaluation which includes but goes beyond academic mastery to the learners’ well-rounded growth as persons for others. Observant teachers will perceive indications of growth or lack of growth in class discussions and students' generosity in response to common needs much more frequently.

Open class discussions have been extremely revelatory for me this year, particularly in MATH 201 (Foundations of Arithmetic for Early Childhood Teachers). These preservice teachers have been very willing to be open in class discussions about their opinions, viewpoints, and understandings (or lack thereof as the case may be). This is has really serve to validate my requirement of class attendance and participation as 20% of the final grade.
It makes evaluation much more difficult for me if a student never says anything in class. Class participation also often differs from performance on standardized assessment methods. So students may exhibit understanding in their oral communication that does not translate to written assessment. Hence I include alternate means of assessment such as: board presentations, curriculum development projects, and worthwhile mathematical tasks.

In MATH 120 and MATH 150, the students who exhibit the most improvement in their academic performance are those who are willing to talk to me and others in class. Small group work really seems to help those students who are struggling with a concept, particularly when they are grouped with a student who exhibits strong academic performance. They may not be comfortable talking to me, but they seem to work well with their peers, if I form the groups appropriately.


Having identified the five aspects of Ignatian pedagogy in my own practice, I realized that I not only value the aspects of the pedagogy, but I believe all teachers should incorporate these aspects into their practice. Hence, my experience in the Ignatian Mentoring Program has led me to the development of a future research project (Fall 2009) that will investigate preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching mathematics within the framework of an Ignatian pedagogical approach. In an effort to provide preservice teachers with a learning experience that models the way I hope they will teach mathematics, my desire is to exemplify these tenets in my own classrooms, such that future teachers will exemplify like tenets in their classrooms; thereby perpetuating an endless cycle of Ignatian pedagogy within countless mathematics classrooms throughout the world. My desire, my prayer, is to fulfill Matthew 5:16:

Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify
your Father which is in heaven.

Back to Top

The Secrets to Peace and Joy: Change Myself by Love

Huizhen (Jean) Guo, Ph.D.
Mentor: Daniel Otero, Ph.D. (Mathematics/Computer Science)

I am a happy person. You may ask why I am happy.

Am I healthy? I am not very sick but I am not strong either. I always feel cold and wear much more than other people do. I need more sleep than other adults do. That is the reason I exercise on a regular basis.

Am I rich? I am certainly not poor; I have food to eat, clothes to wear, and a bed to sleep in. I am satisfied with my living conditions, but I am definitely not rich.

Do I have a happy family? My daughter and I often sing the song "I love you; you love me; we are happy family," and we do love each other and get along well, but my husband has not been living with us for many years, he is not eligible to work in the United States.

How about my work? I do enjoy teaching and my students, but my students do not seem to enjoy their classes that much and I have been working hard on that.

The reason I have joy and peace in mind is that I have faith in God's will, not my own will. God will lead my life. I love God and people as Jesus did. Because of my love, I am willing to change myself: changing my thoughts, perspectives, the way I look at the world, the way I look at other people. Just as the Bible says that all things work together to benefit those who love God, I would like to share what I have experienced spiritually with anybody who reads my article.


Since I mentioned "change", you can guess I was not happy before I was willing to change. You are right. I was unhappy, actually anxious, for years. I was worried about too many things and did not realize the danger of my unhealthy mood. When my daughter reached the age of 15, the confusing and suffering age, the conflict between us triggered hidden problems in both of us. The resulting conflict made me even sadder. I was concerned and pondered, "If I can't get along with my daughter, how can I get along with other people? Who else can I get along with?" I have been walking in dark and struggling, seeking light since then, to find the path to happiness and peace. Human wisdom is limited. My friends' help didn't solve the problem. I turned to God, trying to find answers. I started reading the Bible, attending Bible study and Sunday worship more often. Then the turning point came. That was love, which God put in all creatures' hearts. After a particularly miserable night, the words came to me that "I love you, you should love others." When my heart is filled with love, I see hope and feel joy and strength while when I distrust others, the doubts hurt me first before they hurt others. Once I chose love, the remedy to any wounds, it began to work: changing me and letting me see the other side of me. As the phrase states, I too "focused on the stick in others' eyes, and didn't see the big log in my own eyes." Unconsciously, I set up two standards, the higher one for others and the lower one for myself. I put myself at the center, and expected others to run around me.

When I look at my daughter in a different way, the view is changed. I was upset because she paid too much attention to how she looked. But, do I want her to look unattractive? Certainly not. When I was in high school and college, though I was a top student in all subjects, I was not very confident because I didn't think I was pretty. In fact, I like to see people dressed beautifully, because they decorate the city just like trees, grass, and flowers do. I guess I didn't like the way my daughter dressed. But should a teenage girl have the same perspective on dressing as me? Actually, I have come to ask her opinion when I purchase dresses for myself, because she has a good fashion sense.

I was upset because my daughter didn't do well in math and science classes. The truth was, she thought she was not good at those subjects and gave up before trying. Now I ask myself: am I really good at everything when I was in high school? My handwriting was terrible, and I was often tardy for the first bell, in college too. Because I made good grades, my parents and teachers never criticized me. They spoiled me. Why don't I look at the subjects my daughter is good at, such as English, history, and journalism? She also excels at drawing and cooking. She is making progress everyday and even getting A's in math and chemistry now.

My daughter is in a vital stage of her life. She needs love, care, comfort, encouragement, and guidance. I should be the provider of her needs. God created her and has a plan for her. I don't need to worry about her future. I will love her no matter how much she achieves or accomplishes. I will help and support her as long as I can.

She is changing too, while I am changing. Now I am "the most caring mom in the world" and she is "the most lovely daughter." Sometimes I am wondering if what I said or did is correct or not, since it will influence her. So, I pray to God to give me wisdom to teach my daughter.

I thank God for putting love in our hearts. This love has saved us. The biggest lessen I have learned is that people are different. Every living life is created by God uniquely. We need to accept and respect the differences. People have different talents. Everyone is born to be useful.


Better understanding my daughter helps me understand my students better. The experience of working out the relationship with my daughter helps me a lot when I am trying to work out the relationship with my students. I know all problems can be solved if I can love my students as I love my daughter.

Some students complained that my class was rigorous. My reaction was that math class is not like going to see a movie; it is supposed to be rigorous. College is the place where professors and students should work hard, not the place where they always have fun. Now I am thinking I should try to make the teaching process interesting by changing my teaching style. Maybe studying can be fun if we make it more interesting. That is part of my teaching responsibility.

Some students also complained about my English. I was very upset and thought: if other people could understand me, why didn't the students. It was just an excuse. Now I understand it from their point of view. An accent is a barrier when the material itself is hard to understand. I need to practice to continually improve my spoken English.

I was disappointed when some students could not solve linear equations or couldn't calculate the area of a triangle. I used to think that they had poor mathematics skills, and wondered what they did in high school and how they could learn college math if they were unprepared. Now I think this way: they are not math majors; it is understandable that they forget mathematics. While I took chemistry and physics in high school, I don't remember anything about those subjects now because I never use them. My students are here sitting in the class because they don't know, and I am here teaching because I do know. I used to complain that the students were lazy; they didn't want to attend classes and didn't want to do their work. Now I often remind myself that there were times in high school I skipped study hall and watched a movie. There were times in college I missed classes and went shopping. The students are young adults; they still need time to mature. Even adults make mistakes and delay work sometimes.

I began to spend more time preparing for classes. I give group quizzes, individual quizzes, group exercises and individual exercises, and hands-on activities in class to make it more interesting. For example, when I was driving to school one day an idea came to my mind. Random variable is a basic concept in statistics. I can let the students use either the miles away or times spent to measure "distance from home to school," and collect data on the two variables respectively. This helped them to understand the concept easily.

I used to get mad when I read students' evaluations. The good comments didn't make me happy while the negative comments hurt me at first then the hurt turned to anger. I still don't feel comfortable reading negative evaluations, but now I have learned I can, indeed, find something I can do to improve my teaching skills and to teach more effectively.

Statistics is used in research in a growing number of disciplines. When people say they don't like something, it may very well be because they don't like it. But, it may be sometimes they think they are not good at it. I hope, by teaching statistics, that I can help those who are not good at math/statistics realize that math/statistics is useful and not as hard as they thought. They can learn the material. I hope what they learn in school will benefit them in their work later.

I attended the Lilly Conference, a conference on college teaching, and the workshop prior to the conference in November 2005. The speaker at the workshop was Louis Schmier, author of "Random Thoughts". One thing he said impresses me, even now: you teach who you are. Students can tell if I am happy or sad, nervous or relaxed, prepared or unprepared. They can tell everything in my mind by my tone, the expression on my face, my attitude, my posture, etc. When I walk into the classroom with love, care in mind, they can feel that and can be affected by that.

I have been thinking about why I love my career. One reason is that teaching provides me with an opportunity to speak, to spread my thoughts and influence others. Yet, it is a big responsibility. I need to think carefully about what I say and what I do in classes.

I was nominated as a "professor of the year" recently. I know there is much to learn to become an effective teacher. I am confident and look forward to the challenge. God will help me and give me wisdom and strength to reach the goal.

Current Challenges

The biggest challenge I face now is that I am trying to accept the fact that, while my husband lives with us, he doesn't work. Even if he gets a work permit later, he might not work. However, he may change his attitude once he settles down and absorbs the US culture. In China, many people don't admire those who do certain types of jobs, such as farmers, and bus drivers. Instead, they admire those who make money or have power.

God has a plan for me and will guide me. I must listen and yield to God's will. God has prepared the best for me, just as parents always give the best to their children.

In Summary

When anger, hatred, and bitterness were controlling me, my brain was like a pot of glue and didn't function. That made me frightened. What was I going to do if I could not work? When joy and peace are comforting me, I can think clearly and my brain works well. I need to work. I need to support my daughter and myself, but I also enjoy working. Bad moods consume a lot of energy. Such a waste they are. I wished I could use all my energy in work. Now, I can, because I have learned to love and forgive others, to thank God for everything.

Everyone has three worlds, a spiritual one, an emotional one and a physical one. When my spiritual world is in right order, I am emotionally stable and physically energetic. Spiritual growth is a gradual process; it doesn't happen in one night.

I am still up and down sometimes. Every time when I am falling down I pray to God, and He lifts me up. I need to build up my spiritual world stronger and stronger by feeding myself with spiritual food just as I need to feed my physical body with earth-growing food. Some day, it will be strong enough and not be knocked down easily.

I grew up in a non-religious family. I was told there were no saviors in the world. Only people can save themselves. I would never have become a Christian if I had not come to the United States. There is an old Chinese saying, "It is easy for mountains to change to rivers and for rivers to change to mountains, but it is difficult for people to change." Look at me, I have changed; I am a new person, a happy person. The more I change, the happier I am. Nothing is impossible in God. I hope you can find joy and peace in God, too.

Back to Top

Ignatian Pedagogy: Connecting Biology Majors to Mathematics

Hem Raj Joshi, Ph.D.
Mentor: Lisa Close-Jacob, Ph.D. (Biology)

Hem Raj JoshiSuper goal:

  • Facilitate Understanding in Personally Relevant Manner
  • Magis - Novel Ways to Serve Students and University by Trying New Things
  • Cura Personalis - Considering Needs of Students
  • Challenging Students to Connect Topics

The discovery of the microscope in the late 17th century caused a revolution in biology by revealing otherwise invisible and previously unsuspected worlds. Mathematics broadly interpreted is a more general microscope. It can reveal otherwise invisible worlds in all kinds of data, not only optical (Cohen, PLOS Biology, 2004). For example, computed tomography can reveal a cross-section of a human head from the density of X-ray beams without ever opening the head, by using the Radon transform to infer the densities of materials at each location within the head (Hsieh, Computed Tomography, 2003).

The importance of mathematical and computational tools in every area of biological studies is well documented (Levin et. al, Science 275:334-343, 1997). Mathematical and computational challenges in population biology, ecosystems science, and epidemiology in particular have long been recognized. With new conceptual advances and technology, research initiatives that focus on integration of mathematics and biological issues are expanding very rapidly. There is a general and diffuse dissatisfaction with mathematics among the biologists (i.e. why I need math?). Today biology is becoming more mathematical, and all biologists need some mathematical skills to understand complex biological systems.

We would like to explore results from different biological experiments and connect them to relevant mathematics. To achieve this we will communicate with Biology faculty and develop a need based course (i.e. Teach mathematical skills that will be useful for biology majors).

Why should biology students study more math? There are two types of reasons:

Abstract reasons

  • Improve logical/rigorous reasoning ability
  • Ability to build models
  • Better appreciation of mathematics & computation
  • Appreciation and understanding of important phenomena: exponential growth and decay, limited growthâ?¦

Concrete reasons

  • Ability to perform important mathematical operations
  • Learn to interpret graphs
  • Ability to analyze data: Statistics

Designing a New BioMath Course for Xavier University

As a first step we will modify the existing calculus-based math course, and it will be offered for the first time in fall 2005. This course will help biology majors to understand the importance of mathematical models in biological sciences and use the knowledge in biology research projects. In the future, we will develop an entirely new math course for the biology major.

Back to Top

Statistical Inference

Max Buot, Ph.D.
Mentor: Nancy Bertaux, Ph.D. (Economics)

I attempted to incorporate the Ignatian mission into the Statistical Inference (MATH 312) class I taught in the Spring 2008 semester. This course is typically offered every two years, and is aimed at advanced majors in mathematics, especially those undergraduates who are interested in pursuing advanced degrees in statistics. Although the list of topics in MATH 312 is typical for such a course, my effort to include Jesuit values made it a unique pedagogical experience. 

To be honest, I found the task of explicitly demonstrating the Ignatian mission in an upper-level statistics course to be challenging. In my view, fulfilling this responsibility would require creative and careful planning to ensure that the course remains true to its objectives: introduce abstract statistical theory, prove the main results rigorously, and apply the results to solve a wide array of data analysis problems. As a significant number of students in the class may continue their mathematical education in graduate school, a solid foundation on the course topics is of utmost importance. Assignments dealing with Jesuit principles may not appear relevant or appeal to a student in a math class. 

In order to create an avenue through which Ignatian ideals could be integrated in MATH 312, I interpreted the Ignatian phrase Finding God in All Things as a general invitation to "see the big picture". In particular, students are encouraged to appreciate the wonder of God in their daily lives, search for God's presence in past events, and contemplate the future path that God's will has in store for them. Specific to the Statistical Inference course, this means providing a sense of perspective that elevates their understanding of the ideas presented in the class. To this end, I created supplementary assignments involving journal article readings. The purpose for each article reading can be classified into one of three categories which correspond to my basic interpretation of Finding God in All Things. For classification into the first category, the article should demonstrate the wide applicability of MATH 312 topics in the present-day. For the second category, the article should place the statistical methods discussed in the course in historical context: Why was the statistical inference method needed? What problems motivated the development of the theory? And for the third category, the article should illustrate some questions and problems which are at the forefront of statistics research today. 

The following is an example of how an article reading was incorporated into MATH 312. The theory of maximum likelihood estimation is based on the assumption that the parameter of a probability distribution is a fixed constant, whose value is unknown, but is to be estimated using a random sample of data. Within the statistics community, methods developed in this context are called frequentist methodology. However, if the parameter itself is modeled with a probability distribution, then the statistician is said to be employing Bayesian inferential methods. To better understand the differences between the frequentist and Bayesian paradigms, I assigned article readings from various sources, such as statistics journals and mainstream periodicals such as The Economist and Scientific American. This activity extended the students' perspective on the historical implications of these two statistical philosophies, since scholarly arguments between frequentists and Bayesians played a key role in the development of statistics as a discipline in and of itself in the 20th century. 

To help encourage dialogue among the students, I set aside time during the semester for discussion of the articles. I also required that each student write down a brief summary of their readings. Although there were only a few occasions in which article readings were assigned, the students found this activity to be a valuable component to the course and a welcomed excursion from the usual lecture dynamic. 

The phrase Finding God in All Things captures the spirit of Ignatian values. With thoughtful consideration, each one of us can discover evidence of God's wonder, inspiration, and love every day. As a second-year faculty member at Xavier, my involvement in the Ignatian Mentoring Program has given me an opportunity to reflect on how God is revealed in my own life, on and off campus. It has truly been a worthwhile endeavor. Eight years prior to my arrival at Xavier, I was a busy graduate student and post-doc who was consumed with scholarly activities in the field of statistics. As a participant in the Ignatian Mentoring Program, my perspective on my academic career path has been positively broadened. 

Although I have described a special approach I implemented in MATH 312, I have also developed a clearer sense of my role as a faculty member at Xavier University. As a professor, it's important for me to view Jesus Christ as the ideal teacher. One specific event, the washing of the disciples' feet on the night of the Last Supper, is a valuable reminder for those who are called to lead: The act of leading requires the willingness to be of service. A teacher, who in fact is a "leader of students", needs to anticipate situations in which students seek guidance and direction. This means being organized and prepared for each lecture, and being able to provide examples to elucidate abstract mathematical concepts to the student. As Jesus often made use of parables to illustrate religious lessons, moral truths, and apparent paradoxes, the use of examples, demonstrations, and discussion can serve a similar purpose in my own classroom. With respect to scholarship, an active research program is an exemplary way for a faculty member to contribute to the advancement of knowledge in his academic specialty. Engagement in research is not only an exercise of discovery in which the scholar strives to uncover new and exciting ideas, but it also supplies the scholar a deeper perspective on the discipline he teaches, which in turn is reflected in a student's educational experience. 

Back to Top